In [[First-class functions]], a language is showing how its manipulation of functions is similar to its manipulation of other types.

This tasks aim is to compare and contrast a language's implementation of first class functions, with its normal handling of numbers.


Write a program to create an ordered collection of a mixture of literally typed and expressions producing a real number, together with another ordered collection of their multiplicative inverses. Try and use the following pseudo-code to generate the numbers for the ordered collections:
   x  = 2.0
   xi = 0.5
   y  = 4.0
   yi = 0.25
   z  = x + y
   zi = 1.0 / ( x + y )

Create a function ''multiplier'', that given two numbers as arguments returns a function that when called with one argument, returns the result of multiplying the two arguments to the call to multiplier that created it and the argument in the call:
  new_function = multiplier(n1,n2)
  # where new_function(m) returns the result of n1 * n2 * m

Applying the multiplier of a number and its inverse from the two ordered collections of numbers in pairs, show that the result in each case is one.<br>
'''Compare and contrast the resultant program with the corresponding entry in [[First-class functions]].''' They should be close.

<small>To paraphrase the task description: Do what was done before, but with numbers rather than functions</small>
<br><br>