The '''multiplicative order''' of ''a'' relative to ''m'' is the least positive integer ''n'' such that ''a^n'' is 1 (modulo ''m''). ;Example: The multiplicative order of 37 relative to 1000 is 100 because 37^100 is 1 (modulo 1000), and no number smaller than 100 would do. One possible algorithm that is efficient also for large numbers is the following: By the [[wp:Chinese_Remainder_Theorem|Chinese Remainder Theorem]], it's enough to calculate the multiplicative order for each prime exponent ''p^k'' of ''m'', and combine the results with the ''[[least common multiple]]'' operation. Now the order of ''a'' with regard to ''p^k'' must divide ''Φ(p^k)''. Call this number ''t'', and determine it's factors ''q^e''. Since each multiple of the order will also yield 1 when used as exponent for ''a'', it's enough to find the least d such that ''(q^d)*(t/(q^e))'' yields 1 when used as exponent. ;Task: Implement a routine to calculate the multiplicative order along these lines. You may assume that routines to determine the factorization into prime powers are available in some library. ---- An algorithm for the multiplicative order can be found in Bach & Shallit, Algorithmic Number Theory, Volume I: Efficient Algorithms, The MIT Press, 1996:

Exercise 5.8, page 115:

Suppose you are given a prime p and a complete factorization of p-1.   Show how to compute the order of an element a in (Z/(p))* using O((lg p)4/(lg lg p)) bit operations.

Solution, page 337:

Let the prime factorization of p-1 be q1e1q2e2...qkek . We use the following observation: if x^((p-1)/qifi) = 1 (mod p) , and fi=ei or x^((p-1)/qifi+1) != 1 (mod p) , then qiei-fi||ordp x.   (This follows by combining Exercises 5.1 and 2.10.) Hence it suffices to find, for each i , the exponent fi such that the condition above holds.

This can be done as follows: first compute q1e1, q2e2, ... , qkek . This can be done using O((lg p)2) bit operations. Next, compute y1=(p-1)/q1e1, ... , yk=(p-1)/qkek . This can be done using O((lg p)2) bit operations. Now, using the binary method, compute x1=ay1(mod p), ... , xk=ayk(mod p) . This can be done using O(k(lg p)3) bit operations, and k=O((lg p)/(lg lg p)) by Theorem 8.8.10. Finally, for each i , repeatedly raise xi to the qi-th power (mod p) (as many as ei-1 times), checking to see when 1 is obtained. This can be done using O((lg p)3) steps. The total cost is dominated by O(k(lg p)3) , which is O((lg p)4/(lg lg p)).