RosettaCodeData/Task/Modular-inverse/Oberon/modular-inverse.oberon
2023-07-01 13:44:08 -04:00

75 lines
1.8 KiB
Text

(*-*- mode: indented-text; tab-width: 2; -*-*)
MODULE modularInverseInOberon2;
IMPORT Out;
(* Division with a non-negative remainder. This will work no matter
how your compiler handles DIV (and mine seems not to do what the
Oberon-2 specification says). *)
PROCEDURE euclidDiv (x, y : INTEGER) : INTEGER;
VAR q : INTEGER;
BEGIN
IF 0 <= y THEN (* Do floor division. *)
IF 0 <= x THEN
q := x DIV y
ELSE
q := -((-x) DIV y);
IF (-x) MOD y # 0 THEN q := q - 1 END
END;
ELSE (* Do ceiling division. *)
IF 0 <= x THEN
q := -(x DIV (-y))
ELSE
q := ((-x) DIV (-y));
IF (-x) MOD (-y) # 0 THEN q := q + 1 END
END
END;
RETURN q
END euclidDiv;
(* I have added this unit test because, earlier, I posted a buggy
version of euclidDiv. *)
PROCEDURE testEuclidDiv;
VAR x, y, q, r : INTEGER;
BEGIN
FOR x := -100 TO 100 DO
FOR y := -100 TO 100 DO
IF y # 0 THEN
q := euclidDiv (x, y);
r := x - (q * y);
IF (r < 0) OR (ABS (y) <= r) THEN
(* A remainder was outside the expected range. *)
Out.String ("euclidDiv fails its test")
END
END
END
END
END testEuclidDiv;
PROCEDURE inverse (a, n : INTEGER) : INTEGER;
VAR t, newt : INTEGER;
VAR r, newr : INTEGER;
VAR quotient : INTEGER;
VAR tmp : INTEGER;
BEGIN
t := 0; newt := 1;
r := n; newr := a;
WHILE newr # 0 DO
quotient := euclidDiv (r, newr);
tmp := newt; newt := t - (quotient * newt); t := tmp;
tmp := newr; newr := r - (quotient * newr); r := tmp
END;
IF r > 1 THEN
t := -1
ELSIF t < 0 THEN
t := t + n
END;
RETURN t
END inverse;
BEGIN
testEuclidDiv;
Out.Int (inverse (42, 2017), 0);
Out.Ln
END modularInverseInOberon2.