mirror of
https://github.com/nwchemgit/nwchem.git
synced 2026-07-28 14:15:30 -04:00
include info about possible shrinking of radial grids when using
lebedev angular grids.
This commit is contained in:
parent
03a5dd85f3
commit
a3b85ba2a3
1 changed files with 17 additions and 16 deletions
|
|
@ -694,22 +694,23 @@ to generate the desired energy accuracy (with utter disregard for speed).
|
|||
{\bf Important note to users.} We clearly understand that the default
|
||||
(Euler-MacLaurin/Gauss-Legendre) grids are large and result in slow
|
||||
construction of the numerical components of the Kohn-Sham equations.
|
||||
Alternatively, we have provided access to two-dimensional Lebedev angular
|
||||
quadratures which can be used in many
|
||||
cases to substantially reduce the number of grid points per atom while
|
||||
keeping good accuracy. We have not yet had the opportunity to benchmark
|
||||
the Lebedev angular quadratures to the same extent that we have for
|
||||
the Gauss-Legendre. We therefore do not have recommended Lebedev
|
||||
quadratures for specific target accuracy for all elements of the
|
||||
periodic table. If the user wants to significantly decrease CPU time
|
||||
to solution it is suggested that a few prototype benchmark
|
||||
calculations be done using various Lebedev quadratures (which we describe
|
||||
below) while
|
||||
monitoring the numerically integrated density and total energies for
|
||||
the molecular systems of interest. For many examples we have observed
|
||||
speed-ups of two or more for the same numerical
|
||||
accuracy when using Lebedev rather than the default Gauss-Legendre
|
||||
quadrature.
|
||||
Alternatively, we have provided access to two-dimensional Lebedev
|
||||
angular quadratures which can be used in many cases to substantially
|
||||
reduce the number of grid points per atom while keeping good accuracy.
|
||||
We have not yet had the opportunity to benchmark the Lebedev angular
|
||||
quadratures to the same extent that we have for the Gauss-Legendre.
|
||||
We therefore do not have default Lebedev quadratures for specific
|
||||
target accuracy for all elements of the periodic table. If the user
|
||||
wants to significantly decrease CPU time to solution it is suggested
|
||||
that a few prototype benchmark calculations be done using various
|
||||
Lebedev quadratures (which we describe below) while monitoring the
|
||||
numerically integrated density and total energies for the molecular
|
||||
systems of interest. For many examples we have observed speed-ups of
|
||||
two or more for the same numerical accuracy when using Lebedev rather
|
||||
than the default Gauss-Legendre quadrature. In addition, we have
|
||||
observed that with Lebedev angular quadratures a reduction in the
|
||||
number of radial shells (perhaps by as much as 30\%) might be possible
|
||||
while continuing to provide the same level of accuracy.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{table}[h]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue