mirror of
https://github.com/cp2k/cp2k.git
synced 2026-07-28 06:05:29 -04:00
Introduction on "Optical Spectroscopy"; clean comments in common/bibliography.F
This commit is contained in:
parent
08a39e73b5
commit
9e593d536b
3 changed files with 67 additions and 14 deletions
|
|
@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ electronic band structure of a solid. This approximation comes with limitations:
|
|||
|
||||
- When using one of the common GGA exchange-correlation (xc) functionals, the band gap in the KS-DFT
|
||||
band structure $\varepsilon_{n\mathbf{k}}^\text{DFT}$ is much too small compared to experimental
|
||||
band gaps (Fig. 26 in \[[](#Golze2019))\]. Even with the exact xc functional, the band gap in the
|
||||
band gaps (Fig. 26 in \[[](#Golze2019)\]). Even with the exact xc functional, the band gap in the
|
||||
KS-DFT band structure $\varepsilon_{n\mathbf{k}}^\text{DFT}$ will be too small due to the
|
||||
derivative discontinuity.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ In the upper *GW* section, the following keywords have been used:
|
|||
|
||||
- [QUADRATURE_POINTS](#CP2K_INPUT.FORCE_EVAL.DFT.XC.WF_CORRELATION.RI_RPA.QUADRATURE_POINTS): Number
|
||||
of imaginary-frequency points used for computing the self-energy (Eq. (21) in
|
||||
\[[](#Wilhelm2016))\]. 100 points are usually enough for converging quasiparticle energies within
|
||||
\[[](#Wilhelm2016)\]). 100 points are usually enough for converging quasiparticle energies within
|
||||
10 meV.
|
||||
|
||||
- [SELF_CONSISTENCY](#CP2K_INPUT.FORCE_EVAL.DFT.XC.WF_CORRELATION.RI_RPA.GW.SELF_CONSISTENCY):
|
||||
|
|
@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ Running the input file requires access to a large computer (the calculation took
|
|||
nodes on Noctua2 cluster in Paderborn). The computational parameters from this input file reach
|
||||
numerical convergence of the band gap within ~ 50 meV (TZVP basis set, 10 time and frequency
|
||||
points). Detailed convergence tests are available in the SI, Table S1 of \[[](#Graml2024)\] We
|
||||
recommend the numerical parameters from the input file for large-scale GW calculations. The code
|
||||
recommend the numerical parameters from the input file for large-scale *GW* calculations. The code
|
||||
prints restart files with ending .matrix that can be used to restart a crashed calculation.
|
||||
|
||||
In case anything does not work, please feel free to contact jan.wilhelm (at) ur.de.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -9,4 +9,58 @@ tddft
|
|||
bethe-salpeter
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: Add Introduction and comparison between TDDFT and BSE.
|
||||
Optical spectroscopy is a technique used to study the interaction between light and matter. It
|
||||
involves measuring the absorption, emission, or scattering of light by molecules, atoms, or
|
||||
materials. The resulting spectra provide valuable information about the electronic structure, energy
|
||||
levels, and dynamics of the system under investigation.
|
||||
|
||||
In optical spectroscopy, one of the key quantities of interest is the excitation energy
|
||||
($\Omega_n$). This is the energy required to excite a molecule from its ground state to an excited
|
||||
state. These excitation energies are directly related to the positions and intensities of spectral
|
||||
lines observed in absorption and emission spectra.
|
||||
|
||||
The excitation energies $\Omega_n$ can be computed using various theoretical approaches. Two
|
||||
commonly used methods are linear-response Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory (LR-TDDFT) and
|
||||
the linear-response *GW*/Bethe-Salpeter Equation (*GW*/BSE) approach. Both methods can be formulated
|
||||
using Casida's equation
|
||||
|
||||
$$\left( \begin{array}{cc}A & B\\B & A\end{array} \right)\left( \begin{array}{cc}\mathbf{X}^{(n)}\\\mathbf{Y}^{(n)}\end{array} \right) = \Omega^{(n)}\left(\begin{array}{cc}1&0\\0&-1\end{array}\right)\left(\begin{array}{cc}\mathbf{X}^{(n)}\\\mathbf{Y}^{(n)}\end{array}\right) \quad .$$
|
||||
|
||||
We abbreviate $A$ and $B$ as matrices with index $A_{ia,jb}$, i.e. they have
|
||||
$N_\mathrm{occ}N_\mathrm{empty}$ rows and $N_\mathrm{occ}N_\mathrm{empty}$ columns. The matrices $A$
|
||||
and $B$ are different in TDDFT and *GW*/BSE; for TDDFT they read (for singlet excitations, details
|
||||
on the TDDFT page)
|
||||
|
||||
$$ \begin{align}
|
||||
A_{ia,jb} &= (\varepsilon_a^\text{DFT}-\varepsilon_i^\text{DFT})\delta_{ij}\delta_{ab} +
|
||||
2v_{ia,jb} + \langle ia|f_\text{xc}(\Omega^{(n)})|jb\rangle \quad ,\\[0.5em]
|
||||
B_{ia,jb} &= 2v_{ia,bj} + \langle ia|f_\text{xc}(\Omega^{(n)})|jb\rangle \quad ,
|
||||
\end{align}$$
|
||||
|
||||
and for *GW*/BSE (details on the *GW*/BSE page):
|
||||
|
||||
$$ \begin{align}
|
||||
A_{ia,jb} &= (\varepsilon_a^{GW}-\varepsilon_i^{GW})\delta_{ij}\delta_{ab} +
|
||||
2v_{ia,jb} - W_{ij,ab} \quad ,\\[0.5em]
|
||||
B_{ia,jb} &= 2 v_{ia,bj} - W_{ib,aj} \quad .
|
||||
\end{align}$$
|
||||
|
||||
TDDFT with the common Adiabatic Local Density Approximation (ALDA) or with a hybrid functional (i.e.
|
||||
PBE0) can be a good choice for calculating excitation energies of molecules. Exceptions include
|
||||
charge-transfer excitations where the excited electron is transferred over a significant distance
|
||||
within the molecule. In such cases, range-separated hybrid functionals might be needed.
|
||||
|
||||
For solids, the applicability of TDDFT can depend on whether the solid is metallic or has a finite
|
||||
bandgap. For metals, ALDA often yields good excitation energies. However, for semiconductors and
|
||||
insulators, ALDA fails because the ALDA xc kernel does not adequately include the Coulomb
|
||||
interaction between the electron and the hole of the electron-hole pair (exciton) that forms upon
|
||||
excitation. In contrast, the *GW*/BSE approach is well-suited for computing the excitation energies
|
||||
of excitons in semiconductors and insulators. *GW*/BSE accounts for the attractive interaction
|
||||
between the electron and hole in the A-matrix via the screened Coulomb interaction $W_{ij,ab}$. This
|
||||
inclusion is crucial for accurately describing excitonic effects, which are significant in materials
|
||||
with a finite bandgap.
|
||||
|
||||
Thus, TDDFT with ALDA/hybrid functionals is convenient and computationally less demanding than
|
||||
*GW*/BSE for molecular systems and metals, *GW*/BSE can describe excitonic effects in semiconductors
|
||||
and insulators. For a more detailed discussion on TDDFT and *GW*/BSE, we recommend for example C. A.
|
||||
Ullrich, *Time-Dependent Density-Functional Theory - Concepts and Applications*.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,17 +12,10 @@
|
|||
!> (often ourselves, but this need not to be the case), and as a form
|
||||
!> of documentation.
|
||||
!>
|
||||
!> reference_manager.F provides an easy way to cite these references from the code
|
||||
!> add references here as an easy way to cite these references from the code
|
||||
!> (e.g., whenever the relevant part of the code is executed)
|
||||
!> and to add citations to the input
|
||||
!> at the end of the run a bibliography is printed that can be used, e.g., in papers
|
||||
!> \note
|
||||
!> references need to be input using the ISI citation format, because it is
|
||||
!> uniform, easy to parse, and can be exported for example from web of science.
|
||||
!> (mark the reference, and click 'export to reference software', open the resulting file)
|
||||
!> Furthermore, it can be easily converted to and from using the bibutils tools
|
||||
!> a collection of easy to use conversion programs that can be found at
|
||||
!> https://ctan.org/pkg/bibutils by Chris Putnam
|
||||
!> \author Joost VandeVondele
|
||||
! **************************************************************************************************
|
||||
MODULE bibliography
|
||||
|
|
@ -104,10 +97,16 @@ CONTAINS
|
|||
!> \par History
|
||||
!> 08.2007 created [Joost VandeVondele]
|
||||
!> \note
|
||||
!> - note that the ISI record is fixed format (line length limited and the
|
||||
!> first 3 characters can indicate record type)
|
||||
!> - please add DOI whenever available, this will result in a clickable
|
||||
!> link in the input reference manual.
|
||||
!> - please provide for journal articles:
|
||||
!> - all author names, abbreviate the first names
|
||||
!> - the title of the article
|
||||
!> - the abbreviated journal name (please use the ISO4 standard)
|
||||
!> - volume
|
||||
!> - pages (in case there is starting and end page: please provide start page-end page;
|
||||
!> in case there is article number, e.g. J. Chem. Phys, Phys. Rev., then provide
|
||||
!> the article number)
|
||||
! **************************************************************************************************
|
||||
SUBROUTINE add_all_references()
|
||||
CALL add_reference(key=Ceriotti2012, &
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue