mirror of
https://github.com/openmc-dev/openmc.git
synced 2026-07-28 14:15:42 -04:00
Figure of Merit implementation (#3363)
Co-authored-by: Paul Romano <paul.k.romano@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
512df2f4ff
commit
1e7d8324ee
3 changed files with 62 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -387,6 +387,33 @@ of this is that the longer you run a simulation, the better you know your
|
|||
results. Therefore, by running a simulation long enough, it is possible to
|
||||
reduce the stochastic uncertainty to arbitrarily low levels.
|
||||
|
||||
Figure of Merit
|
||||
+++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
The figure of merit (FOM) is an indicator that accounts for both the statistical
|
||||
uncertainty and the execution time and represents how much information is
|
||||
obtained per unit time in the simulation. The FOM is defined as
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: figure_of_merit
|
||||
|
||||
FOM = \frac{1}{r^2 t},
|
||||
|
||||
where :math:`t` is the total execution time and :math:`r` is the relative error
|
||||
defined as
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: relative_error
|
||||
|
||||
r = \frac{s_\bar{X}}{\bar{x}}.
|
||||
|
||||
Based on this definition, one can see that a higher FOM is desirable. The FOM is
|
||||
useful as a comparative tool. For example, if a variance reduction technique is
|
||||
being applied to a simulation, the FOM with variance reduction can be compared
|
||||
to the FOM without variance reduction to ascertain whether the reduction in
|
||||
variance outweighs the potential increase in execution time (e.g., due to
|
||||
particle splitting).
|
||||
|
||||
Confidence Intervals
|
||||
++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue