mirror of
https://github.com/openmc-dev/openmc.git
synced 2026-07-27 21:55:41 -04:00
Define terms in flux equation for depletion docs
This commit is contained in:
parent
aec246be72
commit
6e1e18ab36
1 changed files with 9 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -319,16 +319,18 @@ normalizing reaction rates:
|
|||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
|
||||
\phi = \frac{P}{V \cdot \sum\limits_i (Q_i \cdot \sigma^f_i \cdot n_i)}
|
||||
\phi = \frac{P}{\sum\limits_i (Q_i \sigma^f_i n_i)}
|
||||
|
||||
where :math:`\sum_i` is the sum over all nuclides :math:`i`. This equation
|
||||
makes the same assumptions and issues as discussed in
|
||||
:ref:`energy-deposition`. Unfortunately, the proposed solution in that
|
||||
where :math:`P` is the power, :math:`Q_i` is the fission Q value for nuclide
|
||||
:math:`i`, :math:`\sigma_i^f` is the microscopic fission cross section for
|
||||
nuclide :math:`i`, and :math:`N_i` is the number of atoms of nuclide
|
||||
:math:`i`. This equation makes the same assumptions and issues as discussed
|
||||
in :ref:`energy-deposition`. Unfortunately, the proposed solution in that
|
||||
section does not apply here since we are decoupled from transport code.
|
||||
However, there is a method to converge to a more accurate value for flux by
|
||||
using substeps during time integration.
|
||||
`This paper <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.05.031>`_ provides a
|
||||
good discussion of this method.
|
||||
using substeps during time integration. `This paper
|
||||
<https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.05.031>`_ provides a good discussion
|
||||
of this method.
|
||||
|
||||
.. warning::
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue