crp/OpenMC
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/openmc-dev/openmc.git synced 2026-07-27 05:35:49 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

removed $ from docs

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Bryan Herman 2014-09-16 16:22:16 -04:00
parent aed4f06f14
commit b5babb67f1
1 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

8
docs/source/methods/cmfd.rst
View file

@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ In eq. :eq:`eq_neut_bal` the parameters are defined as:
* :math:`\left\langle\overline{J}^{u,g}_{l\pm
1/2,m,n}\Delta_m^v\Delta_n^w\right\rangle` --- surface area-integrated net
current over surface :math:`(l\pm 1/2,m,n)` with surface normal in direction
$u$ in energy group :math:`g`. By dividing this quantity by the transverse
:math:`u` in energy group :math:`g`. By dividing this quantity by the transverse
area, :math:`\Delta_m^v\Delta_n^w`, the surface area-averaged net current can
be computed.
* :math:`\left\langle\overline{\overline\Sigma}_{t_{l,m,n}}^g
@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ where
\overline{\overline\phi}_{l,m,n}^g\Delta_l^u\Delta_m^v\Delta_n^w\right\rangle.
Note that the transport reaction rate is calculated from the total reaction rate
reduced by the $P_1$ scattering production reaction rate. Equation :eq:`eq_transD`
reduced by the :math:`P_1` scattering production reaction rate. Equation :eq:`eq_transD`
does not represent the best definition of diffusion coefficients from MC;
however, it is very simple and usually fits into MC tally frameworks
easily. Different methods to calculate more accurate diffusion coefficients can
@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ weight in the source bank was modified according to its location and energy.
Toy Problem Example
-------------------
Before applying CMFD to a large reactor, a simple $1$-D slab toy problem was
Before applying CMFD to a large reactor, a simple 1-D slab toy problem was
analyzed to understand how CMFD works. Table :ref:`tab_1Dtoyinput` presents
data used to construct this problem. For MFD, the mesh was 2 cm over the
geometry with one energy group. A comparison of fission source convergence
@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ Convergence of the fission source is almost immediately reached.
.. figure:: ../_images/entropy_1Dslab.png
:scale: 10
Source convergence comparison for $1$-D slab toy problem
Source convergence comparison for 1-D slab toy problem
To further show this convergence, source distributions were edited at various
batches and compared. Figures :ref:`fig_toy6` to :ref:`fig_toy200` compare the