mirror of
https://github.com/openmc-dev/openmc.git
synced 2026-07-27 13:45:36 -04:00
Address #1023 comments
This commit is contained in:
parent
899c1107db
commit
d29923f6bf
9 changed files with 69 additions and 61 deletions
|
|
@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ Incident Photon Data
|
|||
|
||||
:Datasets: - **I** (*double*) -- Mean excitation energy in [eV]
|
||||
- **energy** (*double[]*) -- Energies in [eV]
|
||||
- **s_collision** (*double[]*) -- Collisiong stopping power in [eV-cm\ :sup:`2`\ /g]
|
||||
- **s_collision** (*double[]*) -- Collision stopping power in [eV-cm\ :sup:`2`\ /g]
|
||||
- **s_radiative** (*double[]*) -- Radiative stopping power in [eV-cm\ :sup:`2`\ /g]
|
||||
|
||||
**/<element>/subshells/**
|
||||
|
|
@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ Incident Photon Data
|
|||
|
||||
:Attributes:
|
||||
- **threshold_idx** (*int*) -- Index on the energy
|
||||
grid that the reaction threshold
|
||||
grid of the reaction threshold
|
||||
|
||||
-------------------------------
|
||||
Thermal Neutron Scattering Data
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Photon Physics
|
|||
==============
|
||||
|
||||
Photons, being neutral particles, behave much in the same manner as neutrons,
|
||||
traveling in straight lines and experiencing occassional collisions which change
|
||||
traveling in straight lines and experiencing occasional collisions which change
|
||||
their energy and direction. Photons undergo four basic interactions as they pass
|
||||
through matter: coherent (Rayleigh) scattering, incoherent (Compton) scattering,
|
||||
photoelectric effect, and pair/triplet production. Photons with energy in the
|
||||
|
|
@ -31,11 +31,11 @@ cross section is
|
|||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: thomson
|
||||
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma}{d\mu} = \pi r_0^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 )
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma}{d\mu} = \pi r_e^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 )
|
||||
|
||||
where :math:`\mu` is the cosine of the scattering angle and :math:`r_0` is the
|
||||
classical radius of the electron. Thomson scattering can generally occur when
|
||||
the photon energy is much less than rest mass energy of the particle.
|
||||
where :math:`\mu` is the cosine of the scattering angle and :math:`r_e` is the
|
||||
classical electron radius. Thomson scattering can generally occur when the
|
||||
photon energy is much less than the rest mass energy of the particle.
|
||||
|
||||
In practice, most elastic scattering of photons off electrons happens not with
|
||||
free electrons but those bound in atoms. This process is known as Rayleigh
|
||||
|
|
@ -50,30 +50,33 @@ The differential cross section for Rayleigh scattering is given by
|
|||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: coherent-xs
|
||||
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma(E,E',\mu)}{d\mu} = \pi r_0^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 ) \left [ ( F(x, Z) +
|
||||
F'(E) )^2 + F''(E)^2 \right ]
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma(E,E',\mu)}{d\mu} &= \pi r_e^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 )~\left| F(x,Z)
|
||||
+ F' + iF'' \right|^2 \\
|
||||
&= \pi r_e^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 ) \left [ ( F(x,Z)
|
||||
+ F'(E) )^2 + F''(E)^2 \right ]
|
||||
|
||||
where :math:`F(x,Z)` is a form factor as a function of the momentum transfer
|
||||
:math:`x` and the atomic number :math:`Z` and :math:`F' + iF''` is a factor that
|
||||
accounts for `anomalous scattering`_ which can occur near absorption edges. In a
|
||||
Monte Carlo simulation, when coherent scattering occurs, we only need to sample
|
||||
the scattering angle using the differential cross section in :eq:`coherent-xs`
|
||||
since the energy of the photon does not change. In OpenMC, anomalous scattering
|
||||
is ignored such that differential cross section becomes
|
||||
:math:`x` and the atomic number :math:`Z` and the term :math:`F' + iF''`
|
||||
accounts for `anomalous scattering`_ which can occur near absorption edges. In
|
||||
a Monte Carlo simulation, when coherent scattering occurs, we only need to
|
||||
sample the scattering angle using the differential cross section in
|
||||
:eq:`coherent-xs` since the energy of the photon does not change. In OpenMC,
|
||||
anomalous scattering is ignored such that the differential cross section
|
||||
becomes
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: coherent-xs-openmc
|
||||
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma(E,E',\mu)}{d\mu} = \pi r_0^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 ) F(x, Z)^2
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma(E,E',\mu)}{d\mu} = \pi r_e^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 ) F(x, Z)^2
|
||||
|
||||
To construct a proper probability density, we need to normalize the differential
|
||||
cross section in :eq:`coherent-xs-openmc` by the integrated coherent scattering
|
||||
cross section:
|
||||
To construct a proper probability density, we need to normalize the
|
||||
differential cross section in :eq:`coherent-xs-openmc` by the integrated
|
||||
coherent scattering cross section:
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: coherent-pdf-1
|
||||
|
||||
p(\mu) d\mu = \frac{\pi r_0^2}{\sigma(E)} ( 1 + \mu^2 ) F(x, Z)^2 d\mu.
|
||||
p(\mu) d\mu = \frac{\pi r_e^2}{\sigma(E)} ( 1 + \mu^2 ) F(x, Z)^2 d\mu.
|
||||
|
||||
Since the form factor is given in terms of the momentum transfer, it is more
|
||||
convenient to change variables of the probability density to :math:`x^2`. The
|
||||
|
|
@ -84,23 +87,24 @@ momentum transfer is traditionally expressed as
|
|||
|
||||
x = \kappa \alpha \sqrt{1 - \mu}
|
||||
|
||||
where the coefficient :math:`\kappa` can be shown to be
|
||||
where :math:`\alpha` is the ratio of the photon energy to the electron rest
|
||||
mass, and the coefficient :math:`\kappa` can be shown to be
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: kappa
|
||||
|
||||
\kappa = \frac{m_e c^2}{\sqrt{2}hc} \approx 29.14329,
|
||||
|
||||
:math:`m_e` is the mass of the electron, :math:`c` is the speed of light
|
||||
where :math:`m_e` is the mass of the electron, :math:`c` is the speed of light
|
||||
in a vacuum, and :math:`h` is Planck's constant. Using :eq:`momentum-transfer`,
|
||||
we have that :math:`\mu = 1 - [x/(\kappa\alpha)]^2` and :math:`d\mu/dx^2 =
|
||||
we have :math:`\mu = 1 - [x/(\kappa\alpha)]^2` and :math:`d\mu/dx^2 =
|
||||
-1/(\kappa\alpha)^2`. The probability density in :math:`x^2` is
|
||||
|
||||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: coherent-pdf-x2
|
||||
|
||||
p(x^2) dx^2 = p(\mu) \left | \frac{d\mu}{dx^2} \right | dx^2 = \frac{2\pi
|
||||
r_0^2 A(\bar{x}^2,Z)}{(\kappa\alpha)^2 \sigma(E)} \left (
|
||||
r_e^2 A(\bar{x}^2,Z)}{(\kappa\alpha)^2 \sigma(E)} \left (
|
||||
\frac{1 + \mu^2}{2} \right ) \left ( \frac{F(x, Z)^2}{A(\bar{x}^2, Z)} \right ) dx^2
|
||||
|
||||
where :math:`\bar{x}` is the maximum value of :math:`x` that occurs for
|
||||
|
|
@ -116,7 +120,7 @@ and :math:`A(x^2, Z)` is the integral of the square of the form factor:
|
|||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: coherent-int-ff
|
||||
|
||||
A(x^2, Z) = \int_0^{x^2} F(\chi, Z)^2 d\chi^2.
|
||||
A(x^2, Z) = \int_0^{x^2} F(x,Z)^2 dx^2.
|
||||
|
||||
As you see, we have multiplied and divided the probability density by the
|
||||
integral of the squared form factor so that the density in :eq:`coherent-pdf-x2`
|
||||
|
|
@ -127,7 +131,7 @@ run-time to do a table search on the cumulative distribution function:
|
|||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: coherent-form-factor-cdf
|
||||
|
||||
\frac{\int_0^{x^2} F(\chi,Z)^2 d\chi^2}{\int_0^{\bar{x}^2} F(x,Z)^2 dx^2}
|
||||
\frac{\int_0^{x^2} F(x,Z)^2 dx^2}{\int_0^{\bar{x}^2} F(x,Z)^2 dx^2}
|
||||
|
||||
Once a trial :math:`x^2` value has been selected, we can calculate :math:`\mu`
|
||||
and perform rejection sampling using the Thomson scattering differential cross
|
||||
|
|
@ -162,7 +166,7 @@ the two authors who discovered it:
|
|||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: klein-nishina
|
||||
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma_{KN}}{d\mu} = \pi r_0^2 \left ( \frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} \right
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma_{KN}}{d\mu} = \pi r_e^2 \left ( \frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} \right
|
||||
) \left [ \frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} + \frac{\alpha}{\alpha'} + \mu^2 - 1 \right
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -188,7 +192,7 @@ differential cross section for incoherent scattering is given by
|
|||
.. math::
|
||||
:label: incoherent-xs
|
||||
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma}{d\mu} = \frac{d\sigma_{KN}}{d\mu} S(x,Z) = \pi r_0^2 \left (
|
||||
\frac{d\sigma}{d\mu} = \frac{d\sigma_{KN}}{d\mu} S(x,Z) = \pi r_e^2 \left (
|
||||
\frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} \right )^2 \left [ \frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} +
|
||||
\frac{\alpha}{\alpha'} + \mu^2 - 1 \right ] S(x,Z)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -213,6 +217,10 @@ Doppler Energy Broadening
|
|||
|
||||
LA-UR-04-0487_ and LA-UR-04-0488_
|
||||
|
||||
Compton Electrons
|
||||
+++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Photoelectric Effect
|
||||
--------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -253,7 +261,7 @@ Thick-Target Bremsstrahlung Approximation
|
|||
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.. _Koblinger: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.13182/NSE75-A26646
|
||||
.. _Koblinger: https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE75-A26663
|
||||
|
||||
.. _anomalous scattering: http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/diff1/anomscat.htm
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -110,10 +110,11 @@ class AtomicRelaxation(EqualityMixin):
|
|||
"""Atomic relaxation data.
|
||||
|
||||
This class stores the binding energy, number of electrons, and electron
|
||||
transitions possible from ioniziation for each subshell with an atom. All of
|
||||
the data originates from an ENDF-6 atomic relaxation sub-library
|
||||
(NSUB=6). Instances of this class are not normally instantiated directly but
|
||||
rather created using the factory method :math:`AtomicRelaxation.from_endf`.
|
||||
transitions possible from ioniziation for each electron subshell of an
|
||||
atom. All of the data originates from an ENDF-6 atomic relaxation
|
||||
sub-library (NSUB=6). Instances of this class are not normally instantiated
|
||||
directly but rather created using the factory method
|
||||
:math:`AtomicRelaxation.from_endf`.
|
||||
|
||||
Parameters
|
||||
----------
|
||||
|
|
@ -353,7 +354,7 @@ class IncidentPhoton(EqualityMixin):
|
|||
Dictionary of bremsstrahlung DCS data with keys 'electron_energy'
|
||||
(incident electron kinetic energy values in [eV]), 'photon_energy'
|
||||
(ratio of the energy of the emitted photon to the incident electron
|
||||
kinetic energy), and 'dcs' (cross sectin values in [b]). The cross
|
||||
kinetic energy), and 'dcs' (cross section values in [b]). The cross
|
||||
sections are in scaled form: :math:`(\beta^2/Z^2) E_k (d\sigma/dE_k)`,
|
||||
where :math:`E_k` is the energy of the emitted photon.
|
||||
compton_profiles : dict
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ module constants
|
|||
MASS_NEUTRON = 1.00866491588_8, & ! mass of a neutron in amu
|
||||
MASS_NEUTRON_EV = 939.5654133e6_8, & ! mass of a neutron in eV/c^2
|
||||
MASS_PROTON = 1.007276466879_8, & ! mass of a proton in amu
|
||||
MASS_ELECTRON = 0.5109989461e6_8, & ! electron mass energy equivalent in eV
|
||||
MASS_ELECTRON_EV = 0.5109989461e6_8, & ! electron mass energy equivalent in eV/c^2
|
||||
FINE_STRUCTURE = 137.035999139_8, & ! inverse fine structure constant
|
||||
PLANCK_C = 1.2398419739062977e4_8,& ! Planck's constant times c in eV-Angstroms
|
||||
AMU = 1.660539040e-27_8, & ! 1 amu in kg
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2610,7 +2610,7 @@ contains
|
|||
do l = 1, filt % n_bins
|
||||
if (filt % particles(l) /= NEUTRON) then
|
||||
call warning("Particle filter other than NEUTRON used with &
|
||||
&photon transport turn off. All tallies for particle &
|
||||
&photon transport turned off. All tallies for particle &
|
||||
&type " // trim(to_str(filt % particles(l))) // " will have no scores")
|
||||
end if
|
||||
end do
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -809,7 +809,7 @@ contains
|
|||
! Issy-les-Moulineaux, France (2011).
|
||||
if (positron_) then
|
||||
do i = 1, n_e
|
||||
t = log(ONE + 1.0e6_8*ttb_e_grid(i)/(Z_eq_sq*MASS_ELECTRON))
|
||||
t = log(ONE + 1.0e6_8*ttb_e_grid(i)/(Z_eq_sq*MASS_ELECTRON_EV))
|
||||
r = ONE - exp(-1.2359e-1_8*t + 6.1274e-2_8*t**2 - 3.1516e-2_8*t**3 + &
|
||||
7.7446e-3_8*t**4 - 1.0595e-3_8*t**5 + 7.0568e-5_8*t**6 - &
|
||||
1.808e-6_8*t**7)
|
||||
|
|
@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ contains
|
|||
x = x_l + (k - k_l) * (x_r - x_l) / (k_r - k_l)
|
||||
|
||||
! Ratio of the velocity of the charged particle to the speed of light
|
||||
beta = sqrt(e*(e + TWO*MASS_ELECTRON)) / (e + MASS_ELECTRON)
|
||||
beta = sqrt(e*(e + TWO*MASS_ELECTRON_EV)) / (e + MASS_ELECTRON_EV)
|
||||
|
||||
! Compute the integrand of the PDF
|
||||
f(j) = x / (beta**2 * stopping_power(j) * w)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -107,20 +107,20 @@ contains
|
|||
! Note that the parameter used here does not correspond exactly to the
|
||||
! momentum transfer q in ENDF-102 Eq. (27.2). Rather, this is the
|
||||
! parameter as defined by Hubbell, where the actual data comes from
|
||||
x = MASS_ELECTRON/PLANCK_C*alpha*sqrt(HALF*(ONE - mu))
|
||||
x = MASS_ELECTRON_EV/PLANCK_C*alpha*sqrt(HALF*(ONE - mu))
|
||||
|
||||
! Calculate S(x, Z) and S(x_max, Z)
|
||||
form_factor_x = el % incoherent_form_factor % evaluate(x)
|
||||
if (form_factor_xmax == ZERO) then
|
||||
form_factor_xmax = el % incoherent_form_factor % evaluate(&
|
||||
MASS_ELECTRON/PLANCK_C*alpha)
|
||||
MASS_ELECTRON_EV/PLANCK_C*alpha)
|
||||
end if
|
||||
|
||||
! Perform rejection on form factor
|
||||
if (prn() < form_factor_x / form_factor_xmax) then
|
||||
if (use_doppler_) then
|
||||
call compton_doppler(el, alpha, mu, e_out, i_shell)
|
||||
alpha_out = e_out/MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
alpha_out = e_out/MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
else
|
||||
i_shell = 0
|
||||
end if
|
||||
|
|
@ -168,16 +168,16 @@ contains
|
|||
e_b = el % binding_energy(i_shell)
|
||||
|
||||
! Determine p_z,max
|
||||
e = alpha*MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
e = alpha*MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
if (e < e_b) then
|
||||
e_out = alpha/(1 + alpha*(1 - mu))*MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
e_out = alpha/(1 + alpha*(1 - mu))*MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
exit
|
||||
end if
|
||||
|
||||
pz_max = -FINE_STRUCTURE*(e_b - (e - e_b)*alpha*(ONE - mu)) / &
|
||||
sqrt(TWO*e*(e - e_b)*(ONE - mu) + e_b**2)
|
||||
if (pz_max < ZERO) then
|
||||
e_out = alpha/(1 + alpha*(1 - mu))*MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
e_out = alpha/(1 + alpha*(1 - mu))*MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
exit
|
||||
end if
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ contains
|
|||
|
||||
quad = b**2 - FOUR*a*c
|
||||
if (quad < 0) then
|
||||
e_out = alpha/(1 + alpha*(1 - mu))*MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
e_out = alpha/(1 + alpha*(1 - mu))*MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
exit
|
||||
end if
|
||||
quad = sqrt(quad)
|
||||
|
|
@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ contains
|
|||
|
||||
do
|
||||
! Determine maximum value of x^2
|
||||
x2_max = (MASS_ELECTRON/PLANCK_C*alpha)**2
|
||||
x2_max = (MASS_ELECTRON_EV/PLANCK_C*alpha)**2
|
||||
|
||||
! Determine F(x^2_max, Z)
|
||||
F_max = el % coherent_int_form_factor % evaluate(x2_max)
|
||||
|
|
@ -517,20 +517,20 @@ contains
|
|||
end do
|
||||
|
||||
! Compute the kinetic energy of the electron and the positron
|
||||
E_electron = (alpha*e - ONE)*MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
E_positron = (alpha*(ONE - e) - ONE)*MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
E_electron = (alpha*e - ONE)*MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
E_positron = (alpha*(ONE - e) - ONE)*MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
|
||||
! Sample the scattering angle of the electron. The cosine of the polar
|
||||
! angle of the direction relative to the incident photon is sampled from
|
||||
! p(mu) = C/(1 - beta*mu)^2 using the inverse transform method.
|
||||
beta = sqrt(E_electron*(E_electron + TWO*MASS_ELECTRON)) &
|
||||
/ (E_electron + MASS_ELECTRON)
|
||||
beta = sqrt(E_electron*(E_electron + TWO*MASS_ELECTRON_EV)) &
|
||||
/ (E_electron + MASS_ELECTRON_EV)
|
||||
rn = TWO*prn() - ONE
|
||||
mu_electron = (rn + beta)/(rn*beta + ONE)
|
||||
|
||||
! Sample the scattering angle of the positron
|
||||
beta = sqrt(E_positron*(E_positron + TWO*MASS_ELECTRON)) &
|
||||
/ (E_positron + MASS_ELECTRON)
|
||||
beta = sqrt(E_positron*(E_positron + TWO*MASS_ELECTRON_EV)) &
|
||||
/ (E_positron + MASS_ELECTRON_EV)
|
||||
rn = TWO*prn() - ONE
|
||||
mu_positron = (rn + beta)/(rn*beta + ONE)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ contains
|
|||
p % event_nuclide = i_element
|
||||
|
||||
! Calculate photon energy over electron rest mass equivalent
|
||||
alpha = p % E/MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
alpha = p % E/MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
|
||||
! For tallying purposes, this routine might be called directly. In that
|
||||
! case, we need to sample a reaction via the cutoff variable
|
||||
|
|
@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ contains
|
|||
end if
|
||||
|
||||
! Create Compton electron
|
||||
E_electron = (alpha - alpha_out)*MASS_ELECTRON - e_b
|
||||
E_electron = (alpha - alpha_out)*MASS_ELECTRON_EV - e_b
|
||||
mu_electron = (alpha - alpha_out*mu) &
|
||||
/ sqrt(alpha**2 + alpha_out**2 - TWO*alpha*alpha_out*mu)
|
||||
phi = TWO*PI*prn()
|
||||
|
|
@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ contains
|
|||
end if
|
||||
|
||||
phi = phi + PI
|
||||
p % E = alpha_out*MASS_ELECTRON
|
||||
p % E = alpha_out*MASS_ELECTRON_EV
|
||||
p % coord(1) % uvw = rotate_angle(p % coord(1) % uvw, mu, phi)
|
||||
p % event_MT = INCOHERENT
|
||||
return
|
||||
|
|
@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ contains
|
|||
SAMPLE_MU: do
|
||||
r = prn()
|
||||
if (FOUR * (ONE - r) * r >= prn()) then
|
||||
rel_vel = sqrt(E_electron * (E_electron + TWO * MASS_ELECTRON))&
|
||||
/ (E_electron + MASS_ELECTRON)
|
||||
rel_vel = sqrt(E_electron * (E_electron + TWO * MASS_ELECTRON_EV))&
|
||||
/ (E_electron + MASS_ELECTRON_EV)
|
||||
mu = (TWO * r + rel_vel - ONE) / &
|
||||
(TWO * rel_vel * r - rel_vel + ONE)
|
||||
exit SAMPLE_MU
|
||||
|
|
@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ contains
|
|||
! energy locally (electron_treatment = ELECTRON_LED) or creates secondary
|
||||
! bremsstrahlung photons from electron deflections with charged particles
|
||||
! (electron_treatment = ELECTRON_TTB). Two annihilation photons of energy
|
||||
! MASS_ELECTRON (0.511 MeV) are created and travel in opposite directions.
|
||||
! MASS_ELECTRON_EV (0.511 MeV) are created and travel in opposite directions.
|
||||
!===============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
subroutine sample_positron_reaction(p)
|
||||
|
|
@ -380,8 +380,8 @@ contains
|
|||
uvw(3) = sqrt(ONE - mu*mu)*sin(phi)
|
||||
|
||||
! Create annihilation photon pair traveling in opposite directions
|
||||
call p % create_secondary( uvw, MASS_ELECTRON, PHOTON, .true.)
|
||||
call p % create_secondary(-uvw, MASS_ELECTRON, PHOTON, .true.)
|
||||
call p % create_secondary( uvw, MASS_ELECTRON_EV, PHOTON, .true.)
|
||||
call p % create_secondary(-uvw, MASS_ELECTRON_EV, PHOTON, .true.)
|
||||
|
||||
p % E = ZERO
|
||||
p % alive = .false.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -298,7 +298,6 @@ contains
|
|||
if (t % find_filter(FILTER_ENERGYOUT) > 0) then
|
||||
! Normally, we only need to make contributions to one scoring
|
||||
! bin. However, in the case of fission, since multiple fission
|
||||
|
||||
! neutrons were emitted with different energies, multiple
|
||||
! outgoing energy bins may have been scored to. The following
|
||||
! logic treats this special case and results to multiple bins
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue