mirror of
https://github.com/openmc-dev/openmc.git
synced 2026-07-24 12:05:32 -04:00
275 lines
10 KiB
ReStructuredText
275 lines
10 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _methods_photon_physics:
|
|
|
|
==============
|
|
Photon Physics
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
Photons, being neutral particles, behave much in the same manner as neutrons,
|
|
traveling in straight lines and experiencing occasional collisions which change
|
|
their energy and direction. Photons undergo four basic interactions as they pass
|
|
through matter: coherent (Rayleigh) scattering, incoherent (Compton) scattering,
|
|
photoelectric effect, and pair/triplet production. Photons with energy in the
|
|
MeV range may also undergo photonuclear reactions with an atomic nucleus. In
|
|
addition to these primary interaction mechanisms, all processes other than
|
|
coherent scattering can result in the excitation/ionization of atoms. The
|
|
de-excitation of these atoms can result in the emission of electrons and
|
|
photons. Electrons themselves also can produce photons by means of
|
|
bremsstrahlung radiation.
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
Photon Interactions
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
Coherent (Rayleigh) Scattering
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
The elastic scattering of a photon off a free charged particle is known as
|
|
Thomson scattering. The differential cross section is independent of the energy
|
|
of the incident photon. For scattering off a free electron, the differential
|
|
cross section is
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: thomson
|
|
|
|
\frac{d\sigma}{d\mu} = \pi r_e^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 )
|
|
|
|
where :math:`\mu` is the cosine of the scattering angle and :math:`r_e` is the
|
|
classical electron radius. Thomson scattering can generally occur when the
|
|
photon energy is much less than the rest mass energy of the particle.
|
|
|
|
In practice, most elastic scattering of photons off electrons happens not with
|
|
free electrons but those bound in atoms. This process is known as Rayleigh
|
|
scattering. The radiation scattered off of individual bound electrons combines
|
|
coherently, and thus Rayleigh scattering is also known as coherent
|
|
scattering. Even though conceptually we think of the photon interacting with a
|
|
single electron, because the wave functions combine constructively it is really
|
|
as though the photon is interacting with the entire atom.
|
|
|
|
The differential cross section for Rayleigh scattering is given by
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: coherent-xs
|
|
|
|
\frac{d\sigma(E,E',\mu)}{d\mu} &= \pi r_e^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 )~\left| F(x,Z)
|
|
+ F' + iF'' \right|^2 \\
|
|
&= \pi r_e^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 ) \left [ ( F(x,Z)
|
|
+ F'(E) )^2 + F''(E)^2 \right ]
|
|
|
|
where :math:`F(x,Z)` is a form factor as a function of the momentum transfer
|
|
:math:`x` and the atomic number :math:`Z` and the term :math:`F' + iF''`
|
|
accounts for `anomalous scattering`_ which can occur near absorption edges. In
|
|
a Monte Carlo simulation, when coherent scattering occurs, we only need to
|
|
sample the scattering angle using the differential cross section in
|
|
:eq:`coherent-xs` since the energy of the photon does not change. In OpenMC,
|
|
anomalous scattering is ignored such that the differential cross section
|
|
becomes
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: coherent-xs-openmc
|
|
|
|
\frac{d\sigma(E,E',\mu)}{d\mu} = \pi r_e^2 ( 1 + \mu^2 ) F(x, Z)^2
|
|
|
|
To construct a proper probability density, we need to normalize the
|
|
differential cross section in :eq:`coherent-xs-openmc` by the integrated
|
|
coherent scattering cross section:
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: coherent-pdf-1
|
|
|
|
p(\mu) d\mu = \frac{\pi r_e^2}{\sigma(E)} ( 1 + \mu^2 ) F(x, Z)^2 d\mu.
|
|
|
|
Since the form factor is given in terms of the momentum transfer, it is more
|
|
convenient to change variables of the probability density to :math:`x^2`. The
|
|
momentum transfer is traditionally expressed as
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: momentum-transfer
|
|
|
|
x = \kappa \alpha \sqrt{1 - \mu}
|
|
|
|
where :math:`\alpha` is the ratio of the photon energy to the electron rest
|
|
mass, and the coefficient :math:`\kappa` can be shown to be
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: kappa
|
|
|
|
\kappa = \frac{m_e c^2}{\sqrt{2}hc} \approx 29.14329,
|
|
|
|
where :math:`m_e` is the mass of the electron, :math:`c` is the speed of light
|
|
in a vacuum, and :math:`h` is Planck's constant. Using :eq:`momentum-transfer`,
|
|
we have :math:`\mu = 1 - [x/(\kappa\alpha)]^2` and :math:`d\mu/dx^2 =
|
|
-1/(\kappa\alpha)^2`. The probability density in :math:`x^2` is
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: coherent-pdf-x2
|
|
|
|
p(x^2) dx^2 = p(\mu) \left | \frac{d\mu}{dx^2} \right | dx^2 = \frac{2\pi
|
|
r_e^2 A(\bar{x}^2,Z)}{(\kappa\alpha)^2 \sigma(E)} \left (
|
|
\frac{1 + \mu^2}{2} \right ) \left ( \frac{F(x, Z)^2}{A(\bar{x}^2, Z)} \right ) dx^2
|
|
|
|
where :math:`\bar{x}` is the maximum value of :math:`x` that occurs for
|
|
:math:`\mu=-1`,
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: xmax
|
|
|
|
\bar{x} = \kappa \alpha \sqrt{2} = \frac{m_e c^2}{hc} \alpha,
|
|
|
|
and :math:`A(x^2, Z)` is the integral of the square of the form factor:
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: coherent-int-ff
|
|
|
|
A(x^2, Z) = \int_0^{x^2} F(x,Z)^2 dx^2.
|
|
|
|
As you see, we have multiplied and divided the probability density by the
|
|
integral of the squared form factor so that the density in :eq:`coherent-pdf-x2`
|
|
is expressed as the product of two separate densities in parentheses. In OpenMC,
|
|
a table of :math:`A(x^2, Z)` versus :math:`x^2` is pre-generated and used at
|
|
run-time to do a table search on the cumulative distribution function:
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: coherent-form-factor-cdf
|
|
|
|
\frac{\int_0^{x^2} F(x,Z)^2 dx^2}{\int_0^{\bar{x}^2} F(x,Z)^2 dx^2}
|
|
|
|
Once a trial :math:`x^2` value has been selected, we can calculate :math:`\mu`
|
|
and perform rejection sampling using the Thomson scattering differential cross
|
|
section. The complete algorithm is as follows:
|
|
|
|
1. Determine :math:`\bar{x}^2` using :eq:`xmax`.
|
|
|
|
2. Determine :math:`A_{max} = A(\bar{x}^2, Z)` using the pre-generated
|
|
tabulated data.
|
|
|
|
3. Sample the cumulative density by calculating :math:`A' = \xi_1 A_{max}` where
|
|
:math:`\xi_1` is a uniformly distributed random number.
|
|
|
|
4. Perform a binary search to determine the value of :math:`x^2` which satisfies
|
|
:math:`A(x^2, Z) = A'`.
|
|
|
|
5. By combining :eq:`momentum-transfer` and :eq:`xmax`, calculate :math:`\mu =
|
|
1 - 2x^2/\bar{x}^2`.
|
|
|
|
6. If :math:`\xi_2 < (1 + \mu^2)/2`, accept :math:`\mu`. Otherwise, repeat the
|
|
sampling at step 3.
|
|
|
|
Incoherent (Compton) Scattering
|
|
-------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Before we noted that the Thomson cross section gives the behavior for photons
|
|
scattering off of free electrons valid at low energies. The formula for photon
|
|
scattering off of free electrons that is valid for all energies can be found
|
|
using quantum electrodynamics and is known as the Klein-Nishina_ formula after
|
|
the two authors who discovered it:
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: klein-nishina
|
|
|
|
\frac{d\sigma_{KN}}{d\mu} = \pi r_e^2 \left ( \frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} \right
|
|
)^2 \left [ \frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} + \frac{\alpha}{\alpha'} + \mu^2 - 1
|
|
\right ]
|
|
|
|
where :math:`\alpha` and :math:`\alpha'` are the ratios of the incoming and
|
|
exiting photon energies to the electron rest mass energy equivalent (0.511 MeV),
|
|
respectively. Although it appears that the outgoing energy and angle are
|
|
separate, there is actually a one-to-one relationship between them such that
|
|
only one needs to be sampled:
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: compton-energy-angle
|
|
|
|
\alpha' = \frac{\alpha}{1 + \alpha(1 - \mu)}.
|
|
|
|
Note that when :math:`\alpha'/\alpha` goes to one, i.e., scattering is elastic,
|
|
the Klein-Nishina cross section becomes identical to the Thomson cross
|
|
section. In general though, the scattering is inelastic and is known as Compton
|
|
scattering. When a photon interacts with a bound electron in an atom, the
|
|
Klein-Nishina formula must be modified to account for the binding effects. As in
|
|
the case of coherent scattering, this is done by means of a form factor. The
|
|
differential cross section for incoherent scattering is given by
|
|
|
|
.. math::
|
|
:label: incoherent-xs
|
|
|
|
\frac{d\sigma}{d\mu} = \frac{d\sigma_{KN}}{d\mu} S(x,Z) = \pi r_e^2 \left (
|
|
\frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} \right )^2 \left [ \frac{\alpha'}{\alpha} +
|
|
\frac{\alpha}{\alpha'} + \mu^2 - 1 \right ] S(x,Z)
|
|
|
|
where :math:`S(x,Z)` is the form factor. The approach in OpenMC is to first
|
|
sample the Klein-Nishina cross section and then perform rejection sampling on
|
|
the form factor. As in other codes, `Kahn's rejection method`_ is used for
|
|
:math:`\alpha < 3` and a direct method by Koblinger_ is used for :math:`\alpha
|
|
\ge 3`. The complete algorithm is as follows:
|
|
|
|
1. If :math:`\alpha < 3`, sample :math:`\mu` from the Klein-Nishina cross
|
|
section using Kahn's rejection method. Otherwise, use Koblinger's direct
|
|
method.
|
|
|
|
2. Calculate :math:`x` and :math:`\bar{x}` using :eq:`momentum-transfer` and
|
|
:eq:`xmax`, respectively.
|
|
|
|
3. If :math:`\xi < S(x, Z)/S(\bar{x}, Z)`, accept :math:`\mu`. Otherwise repeat
|
|
from step 1.
|
|
|
|
Doppler Energy Broadening
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
LA-UR-04-0487_ and LA-UR-04-0488_
|
|
|
|
Compton Electrons
|
|
+++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
|
|
Photoelectric Effect
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pair Production
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
Secondary Processes
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
New photons may be produced in secondary processes related to the main photon
|
|
interactions discussed above. A Compton-scattered photon transfers a portion of
|
|
its energy to the kinetic energy of the recoil electron, which in turn may lose
|
|
the energy as bremsstrahlung radiation. The vacancy left in the shell by the
|
|
ejected electron is filled through atomic relaxation, creating a shower of
|
|
electrons and fluorescence photons. Similarly, the vacancy left by the electron
|
|
emitted in the photoelectric effect is filled through atomic relaxation. Pair
|
|
production generates an electron and a positron, both of which can emit
|
|
bremsstrahlung radiation before the positron eventually collides with an
|
|
electron, resulting in annihilation of the pair and the creation of two
|
|
additional photons.
|
|
|
|
Atomic Relaxation
|
|
-----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electron-Positron Annihilation
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bremsstrahlung
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
.. _ttb:
|
|
|
|
Thick-Target Bremsstrahlung Approximation
|
|
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _Koblinger: https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE75-A26663
|
|
|
|
.. _anomalous scattering: http://pd.chem.ucl.ac.uk/pdnn/diff1/anomscat.htm
|
|
|
|
.. _Kahn's rejection method: https://laws.lanl.gov/vhosts/mcnp.lanl.gov/pdf_files/aecu-3259_kahn.pdf
|
|
|
|
.. _Klein-Nishina: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Klein%E2%80%93Nishina_formula
|
|
|
|
.. _LA-UR-04-0487: https://laws.lanl.gov/vhosts/mcnp.lanl.gov/pdf_files/la-ur-04-0487.pdf
|
|
|
|
.. _LA-UR-04-0488: https://laws.lanl.gov/vhosts/mcnp.lanl.gov/pdf_files/la-ur-04-0488.pdf
|